Lawyer Listings Add, Update, or Remove Listings

Work Made for Hire

The rule that makes an employer, not the creator, the author and owner of copyright in work created by an employee within the scope of employment - and the much narrower rule for freelancers, under which a commissioned work belongs to the client only if it falls within listed categories and a signed agreement says so.

Informational only - this is not legal advice. These definitions explain general legal vocabulary in plain English. They are not advice about your situation, reading them creates no attorney-client relationship, and the law differs from state to state and changes over time. For advice you can rely on, speak to a lawyer licensed in your state.

Looking for a lawyer rather than a definition? Skip to the state-by-state list of law firms for this.

What it means

Copyright ordinarily belongs to the person who creates the work. The work-made-for-hire doctrine is the exception: for a work made for hire, the employer or commissioning party is treated as the author from the outset, owns the copyright without any transfer, and the creator has no rights in it at all - not even the termination right that lets other authors recapture a copyright decades after assigning it. There are two routes into the doctrine and they are very different.

The first is employment: a work prepared by an employee within the scope of employment is a work made for hire automatically, with no agreement needed. Whether a person is an employee for this purpose is decided under the common-law agency test - the hiring party's right to control the manner and means of the work, the skill required, the source of tools, the location, the duration of the relationship, the method of payment, tax treatment and benefits - not by the label the parties used. Work an employee does outside the job, on their own time and initiative, is theirs. The second route is commission: a work specially ordered from an independent contractor is made for hire only if it falls within one of the categories the statute lists - a contribution to a collective work, part of a film or audiovisual work, a translation, a compilation, an instructional text, a test, answer material for a test, an atlas, or a supplementary work - and the parties signed a written agreement saying it is a work made for hire. A logo, a photograph, a website, a song or a novel commissioned from a freelancer is not on the list, and calling it a work for hire in a contract does not make it one.

The practical consequence is that a business that hires a freelancer and does not obtain a written assignment of copyright does not own what it paid for: it has, at most, an implied non-exclusive license to use the work for the purpose it was commissioned, and the freelancer may license it to others. Well-drafted agreements therefore say "work made for hire to the extent permitted, and otherwise assigned", because an assignment - unlike work-for-hire status - can be terminated by the author after a period fixed by statute. Software developers, photographers, designers and ghostwriters are the recurring cases, and the difference between employee and contractor status has consequences for tax and labor law as well.

Where this comes from

The definition of a work made for hire is 17 U.S.C. § 101, and the ownership rule is § 201(b); the requirement that a transfer of copyright be in a signed writing is § 204(a), and the termination rights that work-for-hire status forecloses are §§ 203 and 304(c). Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730 (1989), holds that "employee" carries its common-law agency meaning and lists the factors. Effects Associates v. Cohen, 908 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1990), is the principal case on the implied license a commissioning party receives when no writing exists. The Copyright Office's Circular 30 explains the doctrine. The termination window is fixed by statute and is not stated here.

When people hire a lawyer for this

The agreement is the whole answer here, and it is cheap to get right and expensive to get wrong: a business commissioning anything creative should have a lawyer draft or review a short assignment-and-license clause before work begins, and should not rely on a "work for hire" label, an invoice or an email. A freelancer should understand what is being signed - an assignment gives up ownership; a license does not - and a creator who did work for a former employer or client without a clear agreement may own more than they think. Disputes typically surface when the business is sold or the relationship ends, which is the worst time to discover who owns the code or the brand.

Worried about the cost? A lawyer can be hired for one part of a case only (limited-scope representation), may be paid from what a claim recovers (contingency fee), or may be free through a pro bono program or legal aid; a court can also waive its own filing fees.

Find a lawyer for this in your state

Choose your state to see Copyrights law firms in the city where we list the most; your city may be under “other cities”, A to Z. A state marked “Intellectual Property” has no Copyrights listing yet and opens the broader page.

Alabama (Birmingham)
+1 other city
- Montgomery
Arizona (Chandler)
+6 other cities
Arkansas (Little Rock)
California (Anaheim)
+19 other cities
- Chula Vista
- Fontana
- Fremont
- Irvine
- Long Beach
- Oakland
- Riverside
- Sacramento
- San Bernardino
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- Santa Ana
- and 7 more with fewer listed firms
Colorado (Aurora)
+2 other cities
- Colorado Springs
- Denver
Connecticut (Bridgeport)
Delaware (Wilmington)
District of Columbia (Washington)
Florida (Hialeah)
+5 other cities
Georgia (Atlanta)
Hawaii (Honolulu)
Illinois (Chicago)
Indiana (Fort Wayne)
+1 other city
- Indianapolis
Iowa (Des Moines)
Kansas (Kansas City)
+1 other city
- Wichita
Kentucky (Lexington)
+1 other city
- Louisville
Louisiana (Baton Rouge)
+2 other cities
- New Orleans
- Shreveport
Maine (Portland, Intellectual Property)
Maryland (Baltimore)
Massachusetts (Boston)
Michigan (Detroit)
Minnesota (Minneapolis)
+1 other city
- Saint Paul
Mississippi (Jackson)
Missouri (St. Louis)
+1 other city
- Kansas City
Montana (Billings)
Nebraska (Lincoln)
+1 other city
- Omaha
Nevada (Henderson)
+3 other cities
New Hampshire (Manchester)
New Jersey (Jersey City)
+1 other city
- Newark
New Mexico (Albuquerque)
New York (Buffalo)
+2 other cities
- New York City
- Rochester
North Carolina (Charlotte)
+5 other cities
Ohio (Cincinnati)
+3 other cities
Oklahoma (Oklahoma City)
+1 other city
- Tulsa
Oregon (Portland)
Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
+1 other city
- Pittsburgh
Rhode Island (Providence)
South Carolina (Columbia)
South Dakota (Sioux Falls)
Tennessee (Nashville)
+1 other city
- Memphis
Texas (Austin)
+12 other cities
Utah (Salt Lake City)
Vermont (Burlington)
Virginia (Richmond)
+3 other cities
Washington (Seattle)
+1 other city
- Tacoma
Wisconsin (Madison)
+1 other city
- Milwaukee
Wyoming (Cheyenne, Intellectual Property)

Related terms

Other entries in the same area of law, each written from the same primary sources.

Copyright Registration and InfringementHow copyright arises automatically in an original work and what registration with the Copyright Office adds - the right to sue, statutory damages and fees - together with the elements of an infringement claim, the exclusive rights it protects, and the remedies and defenses on both sides.
DMCA Takedown Notice and Counter-NoticeThe notice-and-takedown procedure under which a copyright owner asks a website, host or platform to remove infringing material, the platform removes it to keep its immunity, and the person who posted it may file a counter-notice to have it restored - with the penalties for a knowingly false notice on either side.
Fair UseThe defense that allows limited use of a copyrighted work without permission for purposes such as criticism, commentary, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research - the four statutory factors, what "transformative" has come to mean, and why no rule of thumb about word counts or percentages is the law.
Patent (Utility, Design and Provisional Applications)The federal grant that lets an inventor exclude others from making, using or selling an invention for a fixed term - what can be patented, the novelty and non-obviousness tests, the difference between a utility, design and provisional application, and why the first-to-file rule makes the filing date everything.
Right of PublicityThe right to control the commercial use of one's own name, likeness, voice and other identifying features - a state-law right that varies in who holds it, whether it survives death, and how it yields to news, commentary and expressive works under the First Amendment.
Trade SecretInformation that derives value from not being generally known and that its owner takes reasonable steps to keep secret - formulas, customer lists, processes, source code - protected indefinitely under state law and a federal civil statute for as long as it stays secret, and lost the moment it does not.
Trademark Registration and Likelihood of ConfusionHow a brand name, logo or slogan becomes a federally registered trademark - the distinctiveness spectrum, the use-based and intent-to-use applications, the examination and opposition process - and the likelihood-of-confusion test that decides both whether a mark can register and whether someone else's use infringes it.
Trademark vs CopyrightTwo different protections that are constantly confused: one protects what identifies your source, the other protects what you created.

« All glossary terms

Part of the LawyerLand plain-English legal glossary. Definitions are written from primary sources - statutes and court rules - and each entry states the authority it rests on, or says plainly when the doctrine is state law with no national rule.

If you cannot afford a lawyer, civil legal aid programs provide free help with many of these problems: civil legal aid programs by state.

Related free reference tools: statute of limitations for a personal-injury claim, by state, quoted from each state's official text - part of LawyerLand's legal reference tools.