Damages in a Personal Injury Claim

The categories of loss an injured person can be compensated for - the bills and lost earnings, the pain and the lost enjoyment of life - plus the separate and rarer category meant to punish, and the state caps that limit some of them.

Looking for a lawyer rather than a definition? Skip to the state-by-state list of law firms for this.

What it means

Damages is the legal word for the money a court awards, or an insurer pays, to compensate for an injury. The categories matter because each is proved differently and some are capped. Economic damages are the losses that can be counted: medical bills already incurred and reasonably expected in future, wages lost and earning capacity reduced, the cost of care and of adapting a home, property damage. Non-economic damages are the real losses that have no invoice: physical pain, emotional distress, disfigurement, loss of the ability to do the things the person did before, and - for a spouse - loss of the relationship's companionship and support, known as loss of consortium.

Punitive damages are different in kind. They are not compensation; they are a penalty imposed on a defendant whose conduct was malicious, reckless or in conscious disregard of others' safety, and they are unavailable in ordinary negligence cases. Most states require a higher standard of proof for them, several cap them or direct part of any award to the state, and the Supreme Court has held that the Constitution's due-process guarantee limits how large they may be relative to the actual harm.

Several state rules shape the number that is finally paid. Many states cap non-economic damages in medical-malpractice cases and some cap them in all injury cases; those caps have been upheld in some states and struck down under state constitutions in others. The "collateral source" rule - whether a defendant gets credit for medical costs that the injured person's own insurer paid - has been abolished or modified in many states. And an award or settlement is subject to reimbursement claims from health insurers, Medicare and Medicaid, which are covered under the subrogation entry.

Where this comes from

When people hire a lawyer for this

Valuing a claim is the thing an injured person cannot do alone, because the largest components - future medical care and non-economic loss - are proved by evidence that has to be assembled, not by adding up bills. A lawyer's early involvement also changes what the future-care evidence looks like, and knowing whether the state caps the claim and how the insurer's reimbursement rights will be handled is what turns a headline figure into the amount actually received.

Worried about the cost? A lawyer can be hired for one part of a case only (limited-scope representation), may be paid from what a claim recovers (contingency fee), or may be free through a pro bono program or legal aid; a court can also waive its own filing fees.

Find a lawyer for this in your state

Choose your state to see law firms for this in the city where we list the most; your city may be under “other cities”, A to Z.

• Alabama (Montgomery)
  +1 other city

  • Birmingham
• Alaska (Anchorage)
• Arizona (Chandler)
  +6 other cities

  • Gilbert
  • Glendale
  • Mesa
  • Phoenix
  • Scottsdale
  • Tucson
• Arkansas (Little Rock)
• California (Los Angeles)
  +21 other cities

  • Anaheim
  • Bakersfield
  • Chula Vista
  • Fontana
  • Irvine
  • Long Beach
  • Oxnard
  • Riverside
  • Sacramento
  • San Bernardino
  • San Diego
  • Santa Ana
  • and 9 more with fewer listed firms
• Colorado (Aurora)
  +2 other cities

  • Colorado Springs
  • Denver
• Connecticut (Bridgeport)
• Delaware (Wilmington)
• District of Columbia (Washington)
• Florida (Orlando)
  +12 other cities

  • Coral Springs
  • Fort Lauderdale
  • Hialeah
  • Hollywood
  • Jacksonville
  • Miami
  • Pembroke Pines
  • Pompano Beach
  • Port St. Lucie
  • St Petersburg
  • Tampa
  • West Palm Beach
• Georgia (Atlanta)
• Hawaii (Honolulu)
• Idaho (Boise)
• Illinois (Chicago)
  +1 other city

  • Aurora
• Indiana (Indianapolis)
  +1 other city

  • Fort Wayne
• Iowa (Des Moines)
• Kansas (Kansas City)
  +1 other city

  • Wichita
• Kentucky (Lexington)
  +1 other city

  • Louisville
• Louisiana (Baton Rouge)
  +2 other cities

  • New Orleans
  • Shreveport
• Maine (Portland)
• Maryland (Baltimore)
• Massachusetts (Boston)
• Michigan (Detroit)
• Minnesota (Saint Paul)
  +2 other cities

  • Minneapolis
  • Rochester
• Mississippi (Jackson)
• Missouri (Kansas City)
  +1 other city

  • St. Louis
• Montana (Billings)
• Nebraska (Lincoln)
  +1 other city

  • Omaha
• Nevada (Henderson)
  +3 other cities

  • Las Vegas
  • North Las Vegas
  • Reno
• New Hampshire (Manchester)
• New Jersey (Newark)
  +1 other city

  • Jersey City
• New Mexico (Albuquerque)
• New York (New York City)
  +2 other cities

  • Buffalo
  • Rochester
• North Carolina (Durham)
  +5 other cities

  • Charlotte
  • Fayetteville
  • Greensboro
  • Raleigh
  • Winston-Salem
• North Dakota (Fargo)
• Ohio (Columbus)
  +3 other cities

  • Cincinnati
  • Cleveland
  • Toledo
• Oklahoma (Tulsa)
  +1 other city

  • Oklahoma City
• Oregon (Portland)
• Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
  +1 other city

  • Pittsburgh
• Rhode Island (Providence)
• South Carolina (Columbia)
• South Dakota (Sioux Falls)
• Tennessee (Nashville)
  +1 other city

  • Memphis
• Texas (Houston)
  +12 other cities

  • Arlington
  • Austin
  • Corpus Christi
  • Dallas
  • El Paso
  • Fort Worth
  • Garland
  • Irving
  • Laredo
  • Lubbock
  • Plano
  • San Antonio
• Utah (Salt Lake City)
• Vermont (Burlington)
• Virginia (Norfolk)
  +3 other cities

  • Chesapeake
  • Richmond
  • Virginia Beach
• Washington (Seattle)
  +2 other cities

  • Spokane
  • Tacoma
• West Virginia (Charleston)
• Wisconsin (Madison)
  +1 other city

  • Milwaukee
• Wyoming (Cheyenne)

Related terms

Other entries in the same area of law, each written from the same primary sources.

• Assumption of Risk and Liability WaiversThe defense that a person who knowingly took on a danger cannot complain of it - and the signed waiver that tries to make that agreement explicit before the gym, the ski slope or the trampoline park.
• Comparative and Contributory NegligenceRules that decide what happens to a claim when the injured person was also partly careless - and they differ sharply from state to state.
• Contingency FeeA fee arrangement in which the lawyer is paid a percentage of what is recovered, and is paid no fee if nothing is recovered.
• Dog Bite LiabilityWho pays when a dog injures someone - the strict-liability statutes most states have and what they cover, the older "one-bite" rule that survives in the rest, negligence and leash-law claims that exist under either, the defenses of trespass and provocation, landlord and keeper liability, how homeowners' insurance responds, and the dangerous-dog proceedings that run alongside the civil claim.
• Dram Shop and Social Host LiabilityWhen a bar, restaurant, liquor store or private host can be held responsible for injuries caused by someone they served alcohol to - the statutes that create the claim in most states and the very different standards they set (visibly intoxicated, under the legal drinking age, or both), the states with no claim at all, social-host rules for minors, what must be proved, the notice requirements, and who can sue.
• Emotional Distress Claims (IIED and NIED)When the law compensates psychological harm on its own, without a physical injury - the intentional-infliction tort and its "outrageous conduct" threshold, the negligent-infliction claim and the limits states put on it (the impact, zone-of-danger and bystander rules), the proof a claim needs, and how these differ from the emotional-distress damages that ride on any ordinary injury claim.
• Independent Medical ExaminationAn examination by a doctor chosen and paid for by the other side - routine in injury, disability and workers' compensation claims, and not treatment.
• Insurance Bad FaithAn insurer's duty to deal fairly with its own policyholder - and the separate claim that arises when it does not.
• Joint and Several LiabilityWhat happens when more than one person is responsible for the same injury - the traditional rule that each is liable for the whole judgment, the modern rules in most states that limit it by share of fault or by type of damages, contribution between defendants, the effect of settling with one of them, and why the rule decides who actually pays when one defendant is uninsured or bankrupt.
• Loss of ConsortiumThe claim of a spouse - and in some states a child or parent - for what an injury to a family member took from the relationship itself: companionship, affection, household services and the marital relationship, what has to be proved, why it is derivative of the injured person's claim, and how it is pleaded, valued and settled.
• NegligenceCarelessness that the law treats as a legal wrong because it fell below the level of care a reasonable person owed to someone else.
• Negligence Per SeThe rule that breaking a safety statute - running a red light, serving alcohol to a minor, violating a building code - can itself establish that the defendant was careless, without the jury deciding what a reasonable person would have done.
• Premises LiabilityThe responsibility of whoever owns or controls property for injuries caused by its condition - the slip on the wet floor, the broken stair, the unlit car park - and the rules that make the visitor's reason for being there matter.
• Product LiabilityA claim against the maker or seller of a product that injured someone because of how it was designed, how it was made, or what it failed to warn about - and the federal rules that can shut some of those claims down.
• Res Ipsa LoquiturThe doctrine that lets an injured person prove negligence from the accident itself when the cause is unknown but the event is one that does not ordinarily happen without carelessness - its elements, the exclusive-control requirement and how it has loosened, what the doctrine does procedurally (an inference, or a presumption shifting the burden), and where it is and is not used.
• Strict LiabilityLiability for harm without any showing of carelessness - the rule for abnormally dangerous activities, for defective products in most states, and, under many state statutes, for the owner of a dog that bites.
• Subrogation and Medical Liens on a SettlementWhy an injured person does not keep the whole settlement - the right of health insurers, Medicare, Medicaid, ERISA plans, workers' compensation carriers and hospitals to be repaid from a recovery for the treatment they paid for, how each kind of lien is created and enforced, the rules that reduce them, and why the liens have to be resolved before the check is cashed.
• Suing the Government for an Injury (Tort Claims Acts)Why an injury caused by a government employee or a public property defect follows different rules - sovereign immunity and the statutes that waive it, the written claim that must be presented to the agency before any lawsuit and the short deadline for it, the exceptions that keep immunity (discretionary functions, most intentional torts, certain activities), damage caps, and the no-jury and no-punitive-damages rules.
• Vicarious Liability (Respondeat Superior)The rule that makes an employer liable for harm its employee causes while doing the job - the reason the trucking company, the hospital or the delivery firm is the defendant, and the reason "independent contractor" is fought over so hard.
• Workers' CompensationThe state no-fault system that pays medical care and part of lost wages for an injury at work without any proof of fault - and, in exchange, takes away the right to sue the employer, though not the right to sue anyone else who caused it.
• Wrongful Death ClaimA claim brought by surviving family members or an estate when someone dies because of another party's wrongful act.

« All glossary terms