The written notice a debt collector must send when it first contacts you, what it must contain, and the dispute right it opens - during which the collector must stop until it verifies the debt.
Looking for a lawyer rather than a definition? Skip to the state-by-state list of law firms for this.
When a third-party debt collector first contacts a consumer about a debt, federal law requires it to provide a validation notice: a written statement identifying the creditor, the amount, and an itemization of how that amount was reached from a stated date, together with the consumer's rights. The notice also names a validation period. If the consumer disputes the debt in writing during that period, or asks for the name and address of the original creditor, the collector must stop collecting until it has obtained and mailed verification of the debt or the creditor's details. A dispute sent after the period still has effects - the collector must report the debt as disputed if it reports it at all - but the automatic stop belongs to the timely written dispute.
The regulation implementing the statute prescribes a model notice; a collector that uses it is treated as having complied with the content rules, and one that omits required elements has violated the statute regardless of whether the debt is real. The same regulation limits what a collector may do in the meantime: it may not overshadow the dispute right with demands for payment that make it seem illusory, and it may not furnish the debt to a credit bureau before it has contacted the consumer about it.
The right applies to debt collectors, meaning businesses that collect debts owed to others and debt buyers who purchase defaulted accounts; it generally does not apply to a creditor collecting its own debt under its own name. Validation is also not the same as proof: verification typically means the collector confirms the amount and creditor with its client, not that it produces a signed contract. A consumer who disputes the amount or the identity of the debtor is exercising a different, later right to make the collector prove the claim in court.
A consumer who receives a validation notice for a debt they do not recognize, or whose amount looks wrong, should send a written dispute within the period the notice states and keep proof of mailing; this is one of the few consumer rights that works by itself, without a lawyer. A lawyer is worth consulting if the collector keeps collecting without verifying, if the notice never came, or if the consumer has already been sued - the statute allows a claim for damages and legal fees against a collector that ignores the procedure, which is why lawyers in this area often take such cases on a contingency basis.
Worried about the cost? A lawyer can be hired for one part of a case only (limited-scope representation), may be paid from what a claim recovers (contingency fee), or may be free through a pro bono program or legal aid; a court can also waive its own filing fees.
Choose your state to see Debtor-Creditor law firms in the city where we list the most; your city may be under “other cities”, A to Z. A state marked “Consumer Rights” has no Debtor-Creditor listing yet and opens the broader page.
Other entries in the same area of law, each written from the same primary sources.