Lawyer Listings Add, Update, or Remove Listings

Representing Yourself (Pro Se)

The right to conduct your own case without a lawyer - available in almost every civil court, and held to almost the same standards as a lawyer.

Informational only - this is not legal advice. These definitions explain general legal vocabulary in plain English. They are not advice about your situation, reading them creates no attorney-client relationship, and the law differs from state to state and changes over time. For advice you can rely on, speak to a lawyer licensed in your state.

What it means

A person may generally represent themselves in their own civil case. The Latin term is pro se, sometimes pro per; the right is long-established and in federal court it is statutory. It is also extremely common: in many state civil dockets, particularly debt collection, eviction and family matters, at least one side is unrepresented in the majority of cases.

The rule that surprises people is that self-represented litigants are generally required to follow the same rules of procedure and evidence as lawyers. Courts frequently read self-drafted documents generously as to their substance, but that leniency does not extend to missing a filing deadline, failing to respond to a motion, or not objecting when the rules require it. The most common way a self-represented case is lost is procedural rather than substantive - the claim was fine and something was not filed in time.

Two limits are worth knowing at the outset. First, the right is personal: you may represent yourself, but you generally may not represent anyone else, and in almost every court a corporation or LLC must appear through a lawyer even if one person owns all of it. A parent generally cannot appear on behalf of a child's claim without counsel. Second, in criminal cases the position is entirely different - there is a constitutional right to appointed counsel where imprisonment may result, and self-representation there requires the court to satisfy itself that the waiver is knowing and voluntary.

Substantial help exists short of full representation. Most courts operate self-help centres with forms and procedural guidance, many run free duty-lawyer or advice clinics, and court staff can explain procedure even though they cannot give legal advice - a boundary worth understanding rather than resenting. Limited scope representation, in which a lawyer is retained to do one defined piece of work such as reviewing a document or appearing at a single hearing, is permitted in most states and is often the realistic middle option between full representation and none.

Where this comes from

In federal court the right to proceed without counsel is provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1654, and the requirement that an artificial entity appear through counsel was confirmed in Rowland v. California Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194 (1993); the principle that self-drafted pleadings are construed liberally comes from Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972). The constitutional right to counsel in criminal cases is Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), and the right to self-representation in a criminal trial is Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975). State courts set their own rules on self-representation, on limited scope representation and on when an entity must be represented; all filing and response deadlines are set by those rules and this page states none. Proceeding without paying court fees is governed in federal court by 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and by equivalent state provisions.

When people hire a lawyer for this

Self-representation is a reasonable choice in a small claims case, a simple uncontested matter, or where the amount genuinely does not justify the cost. It is a much harder proposition where the other side is represented, where the case turns on expert evidence, where a home or custody of a child is at stake, or where the opponent is an institution that litigates this exact case type every week. If full representation is out of reach, ask specifically about limited scope help and about the court's self-help centre before concluding you are on your own - and if you cannot afford the filing fee, ask about a fee waiver rather than not filing.

Find a lawyer for this in your state

Choose your state. Each link opens the directory page for the city in that state with the most currently published law firms in this practice area; a +n beside the city is how many other cities in the state also have one. The list is generated when this page loads, so a state whose listings have lapsed drops out rather than becoming a dead link.

« All glossary terms

Part of the LawyerLand plain-English legal glossary. Definitions are written from primary sources - statutes and court rules - and each entry states the authority it rests on, or says plainly when the doctrine is state law with no national rule.

If you cannot afford a lawyer, civil legal aid programmes provide free help with many of these problems: civil legal aid programmes by state.